Securities Based Lending
It is important to understand the basics of securities-based lines of credit. Purpose lines, commonly known as margin lines, are used to acquire investment securities to add to an existing portfolio. In contrast, non-purpose lines can be used for a wide variety of needs, including tax payments, school tuition, automobile buying and home purchases or renovations, or other non-investment securities asset purchases.
The amount of credit available for a non-purpose securities-based line is based on an advance rate against the collateral of the account. This is very similar to a loan-to-value amount that banks are willing to lend when financing a home purchase through a residential mortgage. Advance rates for purpose lines of credit are limited to 50% of the account value, while non-purpose lines can be higher given the credit usage. In both cases, establishing one of these lines of credit is very simple as the required documentation is very minimal. And unlike most other credit types, the credit approval is mainly based on the collateral value of the portfolio.
The other advantage of a securities-based line of credit is the affordability. There is usually not a fee to establish a line of credit, and the only cost the client will likely incur is an interest expense when the line is utilized. As these credits are secured by liquid collateral, the interest rates are typically economical, especially if using the line for truly short-term cash obligations. Most lines of credit have floating interest rates based on an index, such as the prime rate or secured overnight financing rate, with an appropriate spread attached.
Securities-Based Lines Of Credit Versus Asset Sales
There are many reasons to have a securities-based line of credit available. One example often cited is the option to avoid selling an asset quickly or unnecessarily (and paying the corresponding taxes) in order to have quick access to cash. The timing of selling a security is important to a wealth plan, as is understanding the implications of incurring long-term capital gain taxes, recognizing unnecessary losses, and assessing the cost of long-term capital gains. In addition, there is the opportunity cost. By liquidating assets in the stock market, for example, your client might miss out on greater returns.
The tables below show how these advantages could play out.
Securities-Based Lending Versus Mortgage-Based Financing
An alternative to a securities-based line of credit is a home equity line of credit or a mortgage refinancing. There are pros and cons to these alternative financing options. One benefit of residential mortgage-based lending is that the credit commitment typically is longer. This provides a long-term fixed rate and some interest expense is tax-deductible. On the other hand, the time from application to approval is longer than a securities-based facility. Furthermore, residential lending solutions require a significant amount of documentation such as tax returns, bank statements and paychecks, and the bank performs an appraisal on the home. Alternatively, the largest benefit of a securities-based line of credit is the ease of qualifying and establishing this facility.
Market Volatility: Managing The Risk
It is important to know these lines are not without risk. If the advance rate is too high and the value of the collateral declines substantially, the portfolio can be liquidated to pay off the outstanding balances. It is important to know the trigger points, or default rates, when this will occur, and to understand your bank’s system to provide a notification if the advance rate becomes an issue. If a line does exceed the default rate and the lender sells assets to pay down the credit outstanding, this can result in similar tax consequences as previously detailed. It is important for a client to closely monitor the line of credit against the value of the portfolio, especially in volatile circumstances or sustained market downturns.
Look for a lender who will be proactive overseeing the relationship and securities line as this could lead to early communication of any potential margin issues, which is especially important during periods of market volatility. The client and wealth team working together with regular contact is critical in order to explore alternative solutions to liquidating, such as adding additional unencumbered liquid assets to the collateral, using excess cash to pay down the lines, or liquidating assets that will incur minimal tax consequences. While automatic liquidation of assets is an option on these lines of credit, a lender may be able to work with the client to avoid liquidation. Despite frequent communication between client and relationship team, it should be known that responsibility for the credit remaining within margin is 100% with the client.
Securities-based lending should be an integral part of a wealth management plan. Whether a client needs financing or not, a securities-based line provides a low-cost enhancement of their financial flexibility. Moreover, it enables clients to leave their assets in the market to potentially capture additional returns and avoid tax consequences—thus affording them the opportunity to maintain or further build their wealth.
Authored by: Dan Sullivan, is a managing director and head of private banking and mortgage for CIBC Private Wealth